Power System Studies and Modelling

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Guidance for Asset Owners on submitting and validating mathematical models of assets for System Operator approval.

Connection Studies

Asset owners need to perform connection studies to simulate the performance of their generating asset when connecting to the wider power system. Refer to Chapter 5 of the Connected Asset Commissioning, Testing and Information Standard (CACTIS) for the mandated connection studies. These must be completed during the delivery phase of the commissioning process, as Chapter 1 of CACTIS indicates. If you are undergoing the commissioning generation process, we expect you to scope and plan these early on in your engagement with us. 

The System Operator will review these studies to:

  • assess the new generating station’s ability to help the system operator plan and meet the Principal Performance Obligations
  • anticipate any potential operational issues that can constrain the operation of the new generating station, such as thermal constraints, transient or voltage stability issues
  • assess compliance to the Code, including requirements such as reactive power, frequency control, and fault ride through standards, to ensure the new generating station does not reduce the supply quality and reliability
  • minimise risk during commissioning and testing
  • assess the impact of the new generation connection on power system stability and supply security
  • ensure power system operation and other grid connection parties are not affected by the new generation connection
Image

As indicated in our GL-EA-953 Connection Study Requirements guideline (pictured to the left), these studies will need to be conducted using a vendor RMS model on the PowerFactory case file and/or a vendor EMT model on one of the EMT cases provided in the Fault Ride Through section below. 

Further details on the following studies can be found in the guideline:

  • Power-flow
  • Reactive power capability
  • Frequency regulation and tuning
  • Voltage regulation and tuning
  • Short circuit
  • Fault ride through (see further notes below)
  • Transient stability

Once you have completed your connection studies, you will need to submit a report along with study casefiles and an unvalidated vendor model of your asset to your assigned commissioning engineer and to [email protected].

Information for Fault Ride Through (FRT) Studies

FRT studies are a Code requirement and must to be demonstrated using power system analysis i.e. RMS studies and/or EMT studies. 

To perform an RMS study, use your vendor RMS generator model and the PowerFactory case file, which you can access at the Electricity Authority’s webpage, along with supporting documentation.

To perform an EMT study, use your vendor EMT model and the EMT network models provided below. The EMT network models are divided into Grid Zones to improve computing efficiencies. Here is a map of these Grid Zones. To support you with you EMT study, we recommend you refer to the relevant user manual and PSCAD EMT model files below.

Model for use in Grid Zone(s)ModelModel VersionUser Manual
1, 2, 3Northland, Auckland and Hamilton Generic Model2.0Northland, Auckland and Hamilton EMT model documentation
4Edgecumbe Generic Model2.0Edgecumbe EMT model documentation
5Hawkes Bay Generic Model1.0Hawkes Bay Generic model documentation
6, 7, 8Wellington, Bunnythorpe and Taranaki Generic Model1.0Wellington, Bunnythorpe and Taranaki Generic Model document
9, 10, 11, 12Nelson, Christchurch, Canterbury and West Coast Generic Model1.0Nelson, Christchurch, Canterbury and West Coast Generic Model document
11,13Canterbury and Otago Generic Model1.0Canterbury and Otago Generic Model document
14Southland Generic Model1.0Southland Generic Model document

To complete your FRT study, use the relevant case study and system assumptions. We provide asset owners with system assumptions on a case-by-case basis, so please contact us on [email protected] with your request. 

FRT Assumptions Documents

When conducting FRT studies, use the appropriate assumptions document below:

Grid ZoneDocument
1. NorthlandFRT Assumptions GZ 01.pdf
2. AucklandFRT Assumptions GZ 02.pdf
3. HamiltonFRT Assumptions GZ 03.pdf
4. EdgecumbeFRT Assumptions GZ 04.pdf
5. Hawkes BayFRT Assumptions GZ 05.pdf
6. TaranakiFRT Assumptions GZ 06.pdf
7. BunnythorpeFRT Assumptions GZ 07.pdf
8. WellingtonFRT Assumptions GZ 08.pdf
9. Nelson(coming soon - please contact the System Operator)
10. ChristchurchFRT Assumptions GZ 10.pdf
11. CanterburyFRT Assumptions GZ 11.pdf
12. West CoastFRT Assumptions GZ 12.pdf
13. Otago(coming soon - please contact the System Operator)
14. SouthlandFRT Assumptions GZ 14.pdf

 Modelling Requirements

Power system models are crucial for the accurate simulations of the network. Depending on the type of generating asset you have and its output size, different modelling requirements apply. These are explained in Chapter 4 of the Connected Asset Commissioning, Testing, and Information Standard (CACTIS) and are required at two key points during the commissioning process: 

  1. During the delivery phase, as part of completing connection studies (in the CACTIS, this is referred to as an M1 model).
  2. During the closeout phase, as part of validating your models against commissioning test results (in the CACTIS, this is referred to as an M2 model).

What model(s) do I need to provide?

Select your asset specifications from the dropdown menus below to reveal your generating asset’s baseline modelling requirements. Note: the obligations appear only when all three selections are made. If you have any questions about the modelling requirements that apply to your asset, email us at [email protected].

Image

Due to the size and connection type of your asset, please contact the SO for further discussion.

Image

Due to the size and connection type of your asset, please contact the SO for further discussion.

Image

As outlined in chapter 4 of the CACTIS, you have the following modelling requirements during the commissioning generation process:

Model Software Format

M1 Model (for Connection Studies)

M2 Model (Validated)

PowerFactory

The models provided must be site-specific and detailed.

Image

As outlined in chapter 4 of the CACTIS, you have the following modelling requirements during the commissioning generation process:

Model Software Format

M1 Model (for Connection Studies)

M2 Model (Validated)

PowerFactory

The models provided must be site-specific and detailed.

Image

Due to the size of your asset, you are not required to provide any models to the system operator.

Image

Due to the size of your asset, you are not required to provide any models to the system operator.

Image

As outlined in chapter 4 of the CACTIS, you have the following modelling requirements during the commissioning generation process:

Model Software Format

M1 Model (for Connection Studies)

M2 Model (Validated)

PowerFactory

The models provided must be site-specific and detailed.

Image

As outlined in chapter 4 of the CACTIS, you have the following modelling requirements during the commissioning generation process:

Model Software Format

M1 Model (for Connection Studies)

M2 Model (Validated)

PowerFactory

The models provided must be site-specific and detailed.

Image

Due to the size and connection type of your asset, please contact the SO for further discussion.

Image

Due to the size and connection type of your asset, please contact the SO for further discussion.

Image

As outlined in chapter 4 of the CACTIS, you have the following modelling requirements during the commissioning generation process:

Model Software Format

M1 Model (for Connection Studies)

M2 Model (Validated)

PowerFactory (unencrypted)

PSCAD

TSAT (unencrypted)

WECC (tuned, generic)

The models provided must be site-specific, detailed, and final versions. We expect the WECC model to be tuned and generic. 

Image

As outlined in chapter 4 of the CACTIS, you have the following modelling requirements during the commissioning generation process:

Model Software Format

M1 Model (for Connection Studies)

M2 Model (Validated)

PowerFactory (unencrypted)

PSCAD

TSAT (unencrypted)

WECC (tuned, generic)

The models provided must be site-specific, detailed, and final versions. We expect the WECC model to be tuned and generic. 

Image

Due to the size of your asset, you are not required to provide any models to the system operator.

Image

Due to the size of your asset, you are not required to provide any models to the system operator.

Image

Due to the size of your asset and your point of connection, you have limited modelling requirements. However, to future-proof your generating asset, we recommend you provide as many of the following models as you have available to support the system operator with power system security. See chapter 4 of the CACTIS for more details.

Model Software Format

M1 Model (for Connection Studies)

M2 Model (Validated)

PowerFactory (unencrypted)

PSCAD

TSAT (unencrypted)

WECC (tuned, generic)

The models provided should be site-specific, detailed, and final versions. We expect the WECC model to be tuned and generic.

Image

As outlined in chapter 4 of the CACTIS, you have the following modelling requirements during the commissioning generation process:

Model Software Format

M1 Model (for Connection Studies)

M2 Model (Validated)

PowerFactory (unencrypted)

PSCAD

TSAT (unencrypted)

WECC (tuned, generic)

The models provided must be site-specific, detailed, and final versions. We expect the WECC model to be tuned and generic. 

Note: The above information is provided for guidance only. Always consult the latest version of the Code and the CACTIS for your obligations. If any information above conflicts with what is written in the Code, the Code prevails. 

To understand the software specifications, quality, testing and validation process requirements for each model, refer to the relevant guideline below (the images are hyperlinked).

For Synchronous Assets (GL-EA-716)For Inverter-based Resources (GL-EA-1311)
Image
Image
Applies to synchronous generating units and synchronous condensersApplies to wind and solar generating units, batteries (BESS), dynamic reactive power compensation devices, and doubly-fed induction generators (DFIG)

We also provide the following to PowerFactory example to help with fulfilling the requirements:

Confidentiality

To meet its statutory responsibilities for operating the power system and maintaining system security and reliability, the System Operator requires access to accurate and complete generation asset model information. For assets with voltage and/or frequency support obligations, we expect asset owners to provide encrypted and unencrypted models, along with associated data necessary for power system studies, event analysis, and operational planning. See the definitions and chapter 4 of the Connected Asset Commissioning, Testing and Information Standard (CACTIS) for clarity on what we require. 

The provision of specified model information is a condition of connection. Where an asset owner does not provide the model information required, the System Operator cannot progress the connection of their asset to the power system.

The System Operator receives and uses this model information in line with the provisions of our regulatory framework, including as set out in clause 3(2) and 3(2A) of the Electricity Industry Participation Code 2010 Schedule 8.3, Technical Code A which contains strict restrictions on disclosure. We manage asset information within this framework and apply rigorous controls to ensure it is handled consistently with our statutory obligations and the needs of the power system. 

Under this regulatory framework, many original equipment manufacturers with assets operating in New Zealand are sharing unencrypted and partially encrypted models with us. We understand these to be commercially sensitive and highly confidential, so it is imperative that we protect that information. In accordance with Schedule 8.3 Technical Code A 3 (2A), the System Operator stores the information on a secure server with strictly limited accessibility. More information about our model management processes is captured in our Model Confidentiality Management Policy.

If an original equipment manufacturer requires further information regarding our model use, contact [email protected].